|






















| |
National Parks: Clinton Creates, Expands National Monuments
January 2000

United States president Bill Clinton created three new
national monuments on January 11, 2000: the Grand Canyon-Parashant and Agua
Fria national monuments in Arizona and the California Coastal National
Monument in California. Clinton also expanded an existing monument, the
Pinnacles National Monument in California. Together, the new monuments added
hundreds of thousands of hectares to the U.S. National Park System.
© Microsoft Corporation. All Rights Reserved.
Exactly 92 years after former United States president Theodore
Roosevelt declared Arizona’s Grand Canyon a national monument, President
Bill Clinton on January 11, 2000, designated three new national monuments—two
in Arizona and one in California. Clinton also significantly expanded an
existing California monument. Environmental groups praised the move, but
Clinton drew criticism from Arizona governor Jane Dee Hull and others.
Clinton acted under the 1906 Antiquities Act, which authorizes
presidents to establish national monuments on federal lands. Many national
monuments, such as the Grand Canyon, later became national parks, a
designation that offers even greater protection from development and other
activities.
The new monuments are as follows:
 |
The Grand
Canyon-Parashant National Monument is a 410,000-hectare (1.01
million-acre) area along the northern rim of the Grand Canyon that
includes spectacular canyons and cliffs as well as several tributaries of
the Colorado River. The new national monument is almost the same size as
the adjacent Grand Canyon National Park, although the lands within the
monument will have fewer protections than the national park lands.
Existing mining and water rights, and most cattle-grazing, hunting, and
fishing activities will be unaffected by the designation. However, new
mining and water rights will not be granted, and off-road vehicles will be
permanently banned from the area. |
 |
The Agua Fria
National Monument is a 28,800-hectare (71,100-acre) area located 60 km
(40 mi) from Phoenix, Arizona. The area encompasses two mesas and contains
at least 450 rich archaeological sites, including prehistoric Native
American ruins. The Agua Fria National Monument will be subject to the
same rules and regulations as the Grand Canyon-Parashant site. |
 |
The California
Coastal National Monument sets aside thousands of small islands,
rocks, and exposed reefs along California’s 1,350-km (840-mi) Pacific
coastline. The monument will include all such lands above the high tide
mark and will extend 12 nautical miles (26 km/14 mi) out to sea. The area
is an important nesting and breeding area for an estimated 200,000
seabirds, as well as a feeding and breeding area for mammals such as sea
otters. Existing oil and natural gas rights will be unaffected by Clinton’s
designation, but new rights will not be issued. According to federal
officials, the fluctuating nature of the landscape makes it impossible to
measure the monument in terms of hectares or acres. |
Clinton also added 3,220 hectares (7,960 acres) to the
existing Pinnacles National Monument, located 105 km (65 mi) from San Jose,
California. The expansion, federal officials said, will help protect the
existing monument lands.
Speaking at a ceremony on the rim of the Grand Canyon, Clinton
invoked Roosevelt’s 1908 decision as his inspiration. "None of you who
can see what is behind me can doubt the wisdom of [Roosevelt’s]
decision," Clinton said. "And so it is altogether fitting that on
this day and in this place we continue that great journey." Quoting
Roosevelt, Clinton added, "‘We cannot improve upon this landscape. So
the only thing we can add to it is our protection.’"
Hull and all seven members of Arizona’s Republican
congressional delegation opposed the two Arizona monuments, complaining of
inadequate consultation between federal and local authorities. Other critics,
such as Senator Frank Murkowski, an Alaska Republican, have characterized
presidential actions under the Antiquities Act as an abuse of executive power.
Still others said Clinton’s move was merely an attempt to burnish his image.
Clinton denied those allegations and cited a newspaper poll indicating that
the majority of Arizona residents supported his decision.
The official Web site of the
Arizona Sierra
Club features a press release praising Clinton’s actions.
The official Web site of the
State
of Arizona offers links to Governor Hull's office
and other information.

The material on this web page is
mainly from Microsoft Encarta 2000 Yearbook
Update.
© Microsoft Corporation. All Rights Reserved.
| |
|